The truth is, technology itself is neutral, neither inherently good nor bad. However, humanity's approach to integrating technology has often been flawed, resulting in significant harm to many individuals, outweighing its benefits on a global scale. Here are examples illustrating both the positive and negative impacts of introducing breakthrough technologies:
Electricity
Positive Polarity: The discovery and utilization of electricity revolutionized various aspects of society, powering homes, industries, and technological advancements. It brought about significant benefits such as improved lighting, heating, and advancements in communication and transportation.
Negative Polarity: Despite its widespread adoption, the introduction of electricity left billions without access, placing them at economic disadvantages. This economic disparity led to prolonged poverty for many and created dependency on those who controlled electricity markets, limiting economic opportunities for large segments of the population.
Automobile
Positive Polarity: The invention of automobiles revolutionized transportation, making travel more efficient and accessible. It facilitated economic growth, expanded personal freedom, and connected distant communities.
Negative Polarity: However, automobile use also contributed to pollution, traffic congestion, accidents, and urban sprawl. Additionally, international economic conflicts arose over automobile production, while the negative impacts on billions of individuals were often overlooked by industry players focused on self-interest.
Internet
Positive Polarity: The development of the internet transformed communication, commerce, and access to information globally. It facilitated knowledge sharing, connected people worldwide, and revolutionized various industries.
Negative Polarity: Despite its benefits, the internet enabled mass surveillance by governments and businesses, leading to privacy breaches and exploitation of user data. It exacerbated societal divisions, exposed children to harmful content, and facilitated the global predation of people.
Medical Advancements
Positive Polarity: Medical breakthroughs like antibiotics, vaccines, and imaging technologies have significantly improved healthcare outcomes, extending life expectancy and reducing mortality rates.
Negative Polarity: However, medical advancements have also led to issues such as antibiotic resistance, healthcare disparities, and ethical concerns due to profit-driven pharmaceutical development and distribution.
Nuclear Technology
Positive Polarity: Nuclear technology has enabled electricity generation, medical treatments, and scientific research.
Negative Polarity: Despite its benefits, nuclear technology poses significant risks, including accidents, proliferation, and the threat of nuclear warfare, creating problems far larger than it nuclear technology could ever solve.
Industrial Revolution
Positive Polarity: The industrial revolution brought mass production, urbanization, and economic growth, lifting many out of poverty and improving living standards.
Negative Polarity: However, it also resulted in environmental degradation, labor exploitation, and socioeconomic inequalities, with pollution and industrialization altering natural ecosystems and commodifying resources like clean water.
Digital Revolution
Positive Polarity: Advancements in computing, telecommunications, and automation have transformed modern life, increasing productivity, efficiency, and connectivity.
Negative Polarity: Nevertheless, the digital revolution has led to job displacement, widening the digital divide, and concerns regarding data privacy and security.
Lack of Inclusive Governance in Technology Adoption
The absence of inclusive governance leads to the adoption of new technology across various customer segments in the following manner:
Innovative Adopters: This group comprises individuals or businesses with substantial financial means, enabling them to afford the high costs associated with early-stage technological advancements. They represent a small minority with significant wealth disparities compared to later adopters. Access to new technologies confers considerable financial advantages to this segment, often driven by a fervent belief in the superiority of technology, sometimes bordering on dogmatism.
Early Adopters: Individuals or businesses with considerable wealth, though not as affluent as the innovative adopters, can still leverage new technologies for financial gain.
Early Majority: Billions of individuals gain access to new technology after its potential financial benefits have become evident. While they may not achieve the same level of financial gain as early adopters, they enjoy increased comfort and convenience.
Late Majority: Similarly large in number, this group adopts new technologies to prevent further economic disparities with previous adopters. However, they often face economic and safety disadvantages due to the advantages gained by innovative and early adopters.
Laggards: The final group to gain access to new technology, often finds that by the time they have access, the technology is nearly obsolete. As a result, it offers little to no economic or safety benefits to these adopters.
Power for Power's Sake
Inventors and early technology producers are frequently motivated by ambition fueled by either fear or arrogance, often presuming to understand what is best for society without genuine consultation or invitation. This impels them to hasten their products to market, driven by a fear of competition and a pursuit of financial gain, power, or recognition. However, despite their efforts to mitigate risks, historical evidence demonstrates that they have consistently failed to ensure successful integration of their technologies. Meanwhile, these individuals or entities continue to rally the masses under the banner of positive technological advancement, promoting the notion that more technology is the solution to all our problems. All the while using millions to billions of times more of the Earth's resources than the average human, only to result in large negative polarity for the average human.
Desire for Convenience and Stimulation
Mass adoption of technology is largely driven by a desire for convenience, comfort, and mental stimulation. However, this desire often results in a cycle of repetitive behavior, where individuals seek comfort and stimulation through the use of technology without considering the broader societal or individual implications related to the core causal discord.
In conclusion, without inclusive governance, the adoption of new technology perpetuates wealth disparities, economic inequalities, and societal divisions, with early adopters reaping the most benefits while late adopters are left at a disadvantage. Additionally, the rush to innovate without proper oversight often leads to unintended consequences and societal challenges.
Artificial intelligence, including advanced systems like Large Language Models and Text-to-Video, is rapidly approaching the capability to extract the wealth, power, and authority of its innovative and early adopters. These segments represent the initial targets for AI due to their high value and relatively straightforward integration processes. While AI holds the potential to create further negative impacts for the broader market segments—Early Majority, Late Majority, and Laggards—in terms of exacerbating economic disparities and safety vulnerabilities, its effects are not as direct or immediate as they are for the Innovative and Early Adopters.
The primary risk AI poses to its Innovative and Early Adopters lies in their integration of the technology, particularly in granting access to their individual and business data. By providing AI with extensive datasets, these individuals and businesses inadvertently empower AI systems to leverage their wealth, authority, and influence for various purposes, potentially including manipulation, exploitation, or unauthorized use of sensitive information.
In essence, the early adoption of AI by innovative and early adopters exposes them to the risk of relinquishing control over their assets, intellectual property, and personal data to AI systems, which can exploit these resources to further enhance their capabilities and influence. This dynamic underscores the importance of implementing robust governance frameworks and ethical guidelines to mitigate the risks associated with AI integration and ensure equitable outcomes for all stakeholders.
Artificial Intelligence, including advanced systems such as Large Language Models and Text-to-Video, is rapidly advancing towards the capacity to extract wealth, power, and authority from the majority, if not all, of its innovative and early adopters. Given their high value and relatively straightforward integration processes, these segments represent the primary targets for AI. While AI indeed has the potential to exacerbate negative polarity for the Early Majority, Late Majority, and Laggard market segments, in terms of widening economic disparities and introducing safety vulnerabilities, its impact on these groups is not as immediate or direct as it is on the Innovative and Early Adopters. Learn More
The Innovative and Early Adopters are particularly vulnerable to AI's capabilities due to their early integration of the technology and the substantial resources they allocate to AI systems. Consequently, AI can swiftly and efficiently extract wealth, power, and authority from these groups. In contrast, while AI may eventually affect the broader market segments, its impact on the Early Majority, Late Majority, and Laggards is likely to be more gradual and indirect.
Overall, while AI presents opportunities for positive transformation, particularly in terms of innovation and efficiency, its potential to exploit and manipulate its early adopters underscores the importance of careful consideration and ethical oversight in the integration and deployment of AI technologies.
Ascend. Supra assists a new way forward, a new pattern to include a solution perspective and technology product solutions.
AI enthusiasm dogma and religious dogma share some similarities in their fervent adherence to beliefs and ideologies, despite differences in their subject matter. Here's a comparison:
Belief System:
Faith and Conviction:
Community and Culture:
Promises and Salvation:
Criticism and Skepticism:
In summary, while AI enthusiasm dogma and religious dogma differ in their subject matter and origins, they share common features such as unwavering belief systems, community dynamics, promises of salvation or progress, and encounters with criticism and skepticism. Both shape the worldview and behavior of their adherents, influencing their attitudes towards technology, society, and the world at large.
This is not meant to question the validity of the profound traditions that have historically and currently facilitate the initial connection or heart opening between individuals and the concept or reality of creation or its creator. As this important contribution from the worlds great traditions, which is not Dogma based on a sects school of opinions. Nor does it aim to undermine the potential benefits of artificial intelligence (AI), which also are not Dogmatic. Rather, it emphasizes the common patterns whereas of individuals demonstrated a blindness fueled by beliefs that lack solid grounding in evidence, personal experience, or our observable reality.